|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 22 post(s) |
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
217
   |
Posted - 2012.03.06 20:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bummed that I would need to retrain battle cruiser to 5 on 2 other races..
But thats the way it should be. Currently I fing rock in a myrmidon despite only having the cruiser skill to 3.
I'm okay with this long term.
Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP. |
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
217
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 20:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:
No one is saying you have to retrain them. Our principle for the reimbursement here will be "if you could fly it yesterday, you can still fly it today". Ytterbium will post the further details of this once it's written up.
Really?
Players need to HTFU. Ya have battle cruiser to 5 and can pilot all 4 battle cruisers like a boss....
But should I?
I only traind gallentai cruiser to 3, and I have no rail gun skills and no other gallentai ships..
Yet stick me a myrmidon with auto cannons and I will perform just as well as any through and through gallentai player.
Seems a bit odd that one skill gives such a good return.
Also any bonuse re imbersment favors more experianced players over new players...Just because I can now fly all 3 battle cruisers at level 5 does that mean i get all the battle cruisers to 5?
Where as a newer player is even further behind to get to where I am.
Refund the single skill and call it done IMO
Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP. |
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
219
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 21:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
I really like that rather than one tier sucking and we all use the other one that there would be ship lines.
Having a faster hull does nto mean it is weaker just diffrent. be really cool if this matched the sub faction lines...
Say brutor ships or bruto hulls tend to be more ganky where as thucker tend to be faster.
Shame all that is lost amungst all these pansies whining because they may have to train up a racial battle cruiser skill like we should have had to originally.
Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP. |
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
219
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 21:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
VaL Iscariot wrote:Thanks for dumbing the game down, CCP. You guys pull that **** with Capitals, Command Ships, and Battlecruisers, I'm done. I'm not spending four months training up all the battlecruisers to 5 and I really don't appreciate you 'streamlining' this game so a bunch of new fags can understand it better. Kick them in the ass and tell them to read a mother ******* book and stop giving away hand outs. Battleship V should be a requirement to fly a ******* capital ship. Comparing that to the progression to a Hulk places high in my top 5 boneheaded things CCP has said.
You should be making this game harder, not easier. Think about that before you **** everything up... again.
hahaha dumbing down=more skills and needing to chose a faction to specialize.
oh knows having to speciallise is a races battle cruiser like any other ship in the game....what ever shall i do..
Really HTFU....
Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP. |
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
220
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 21:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Messilina wrote:VaL Iscariot wrote:Thanks for dumbing the game down, CCP. You guys pull that **** with Capitals, Command Ships, and Battlecruisers, I'm done. I'm not spending four months training up all the battlecruisers to 5 and I really don't appreciate you 'streamlining' this game so a bunch of new fags can understand it better. Kick them in the ass and tell them to read a mother ******* book and stop giving away hand outs. Battleship V should be a requirement to fly a ******* capital ship. Comparing that to the progression to a Hulk places high in my top 5 boneheaded things CCP has said.
You should be making this game harder, not easier. Think about that before you **** everything up... again. Agreed. It becomes ever more obvious that the devs don't play eve, or at least they don't pvp, which is just as damning. What the heck? No dude, Tiericide is proof positive that they DO play and PVP. -Liang
And that they DO listen
Also battle cruiser is the single most valuable skill in EvE....the most common combat ships are.....battle cruisers by far! and traning that one single skill and racial cruiser to 3 gets you the 4 most common ships in eve....one skill.
When giving advice to newer players it is always 100% train battle cruisers.
Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP. |
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
222
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 21:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Knug LiDi wrote:Despite the howling wind about SP and BC 5, for me the single most important thing I saw in the blog was the image showing t1 (tech one) ships in the centre at the bottom with navy the pirate ships showing increasing improvement. T2 on the right showing increasing specialization and t3 on the left showing increasing flexibility
BUT OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE was T2 being higher in "improvement" than T3
T2 ships are optimized for a single role - a T3 ship, being more flexible can do many things, and all those things better than t1 and possibly Navy ships. But they are not supposed to be "improved" enough to do T2 roles better than T2 ships
T2 logistic ships should be better than T3 ships in that role (repping)
T2 field command ships should be better than T3 ships in this role (brawling)
T2 fleet command ships should be better than T3 ships in that role (boosting)
A cov ops (scanner not stealth bomber) should be a better probing/scanning ship than a T3
Similarly for other T2 roles.
I look forward to seeing the changes that bring T3 ships below T2 ships, for that specific t2 role.
THIS.
Right now it's t3 or go home.
Legions>zealots in every way
t3 booster>any command ship
Loki>any t2 mimnitar ship...faster than a vaga, ganker than a munin....
Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP. |
|
|
| |
|